PENENTUAN BUKTI-BUKTI YANG CUKUP OLEH PENYIDIK KEPOLISIAN SEBAGAI DASAR UNTUK MENETAPKAN SESEORANG MENJADI TERSANGKA PADA TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN (Studi Kasus: Polres Bangkinang Kabupaten Kampar)
Abstract: Investigation is
regulated in section 1 of subsection 2 in Criminal Code Procedures’ Book. Based
on the result of the investigation, when some evidences have been found that
someone has conducted criminal offense then a detention can be done to the
criminal. A detention order is conducted to someone who is suspected in doing
criminal offense based on the sufficient preliminary evidence that is the
preliminary evidence to suppose that there is criminal offense. Formulation of
the problem 1) How is the way of the police investigator in determining
sufficient evidence as a basis to assign someone to be a suspect of theft
criminal offense? 2) What obstacles and efforts are faced by the police
investigator in determining sufficient evidence as a basis to determine someone
as a suspect of theft criminal offense? This study used socio legal approach
and it was descriptive research. In collecting the data, it was conducted through
interview and documentary study. Analysis of the data was qualitative method.
Based on this study condluded that the police investigator could determine the
sufficient evidences to assign someone as a suspect of theft criminal offence
by 2 sufficient evidences. The constraints were from internal and external
factor. In internal factor, there were constraints by the investigator, the
suspect, the evidence and facilities and basic facilities. While in external
factor, there was constraint by society side as witness, even as victim by the
theft criminal offence itself. The efforts were conducting trainings
periodically to the police investigator side, establishing cooperation with the
government side, and conducting socialization.
Penulis: Imam Muhammad Afif.A
Imam Muhammad
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd160490
