PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KETERANGAN AHLI PSIKIATRI FORENSIK DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR : 144/Pid.B/2014/PN.CJ
Abstract: Remarks expert
forensic psychiatry is one means of evidence referred to in Article 184
paragraph (1) Criminal Procedure Code. Description of these experts affirmed in
Article 1 point 28, the Criminal Procedure Code. Where the forensic psychiatry
expert knowledge to be useful to provide law enforcement officers with regard
to the psychological state of a criminal in homicides committed by the
defendant against his own mother as stipulated in the decision number 144 /
Pid.B / 2014 / PN.CJ. Formulation of the problem: (1) How does the judge
considered the testimony of forensic psychiatrists in the case verdict No. 144
/ Pid.B / 2014 / PN.CJ? (2) How does the application of the law on forensic
psychiatry expert testimony in a court
ruling No. 144 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.CJ?.
This research used normative approach.
This study reviewed a court decision No.144/Pid.B/2014/ PN.CJ. Data was
collected by documentary study, and analyzed qualitatively. Results of the
study 1) the judge in his ruling had been consideration of forensic psychiatry expert
testimony with other witness testimony and documentary evidence has convinced
the judge that the defendant is free from any prosecution. 2) adoption of the
law on forensic psychiatry expert testimony has convinced a judge to take a
decision based on the provisions of Article 184 paragraph (1) Criminal
Procedure Code, Article 186 Criminal Procedure Code, Article 1 point 28
Criminal Code, Article 120 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 133 Criminal
Procedure Code and Article 179 Criminal Procedure Code.
Penulis: Tantyo Cahyo
Priharyanto Tantyo Cahyo
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd160489
