ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PAILIT TERHADAP PT.TELKOMSEL TBK.
ABSTRACT: At this time the
problems of bankruptcy, especially regarding the bankruptcy of a company in
this case is a company-owned enterprises in the form of a limited liability
company (PT) gets the spotlight and public attention from legal experts,
non-governmental organizations as well as from law enforcement officers.
Assessment of the public if a large state-owned enterprises company stated
bankrupt raises a question as to why and how a company could be declared
bankrupt, but is a great company.
The problem in this writing is about an award to be insolvent if viewed
review of Act No. 37 of 2004 regarding
bankruptcy and suspension of debt payment obligation the authority of the
commercial court is in check and prosecute a case of bankruptcy, as well as
concerning the application of the provisions of the law on bankruptcy and pkpu
in the case of the award bankruptcy PT.Telkomsel Tbk.
Research methods used to draw up this thesis by the normative legal
research or referred also to the study of librarianship (library research).
Data collection is carried out by the research based on primary and secondary
legal materials. Data collection tools from books, articles, magazines and the
internet, which is closely related to the intent and purpose of this thesis
writing.
The conclusion of writing is that of a fallacy in this sense the award
bankrupt based on law on bankruptcy and PKPU if not understood in more clear,
and differences between the supreme court verdict on the commercial court until
could have an award bankrupt occurs not because of debt but because the fastest
defaults authority of a court in a cause especially in matters of the award
bankrupt sometimes done without any a autonomy or irrespective of both parties
equally until sometimes inflict a uncertainty law.
Penulis: Agnes W Samosir,
Ramli Siregar, Windha
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd160001
