KAJIAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 2/SKLN-X/2012 TENTANG SENGKETA KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA NEGARA ANTARA PRESIDEN, DPR DAN BPK

Abstract: Based on the Constitutional Court Decision No. 2/SKLN-X/2012 states thar purchased shares of PT NNT could be happened if the funds to purchase these shares has been stipulated in the state budget (APBN) in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 of the Law No. 17/2003 on state finance. Therefore, the House of Representatives and the State Audit Board has considered taking and/or blocking the constitutional authority. Formulation of the problem this research is 1) What are the legal considerations in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 2/SKLN-X/2012 concerning the authority of state institutions dispute between the President of the Republic of Indonesia, DPR and BPK? 2) What about the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 2/SKLN-X/2012 concerning the authority of state institutions dispute between the President of the Republic of Indonesia, DPR and BPK?. This type of research is a normative legal research, the data source used is the primary legal materials,secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials, data collection techniques used is literary study and analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions from the study : 1) Consideration of the legal Constitutional Court Decision No. 2/SKLN-X/2012 is the authority of the Court to hear the petition a quo, legal status Petitioner, Respondent I and Respondent II and substance of the petition has no legal grounds 2) The legal implications Decision Constitutional Court Number 2/SKLN-X/2012 be delayed stock purchases because they have parliamentary approval, and benefiting the foreign investors in the purchase of shares of PT NNT, the Parliament still allow the government to purchase 7% (percent) of shares in PT NNT through Parliament approval first.
Keywords: Decision, Constitutional Court, State Institutions
Penulis: Al Riyadi Faisal
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd170027

Artikel Terkait :