Peningkatan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa melalui Penggunaan Scaffolding dalam Strategi Argument-Driven Inquiry
Abstract: Research
has been conducted
to compare the
quality of argumentation
of students participating
in basic biology course based the
discourse patterns between Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) and Argument-Driven Inquiry with
Scaffolding (ADIS) strategy.
Data collected through
argumentation observation sheets
and audio-visual recording followed by transcription of course. A total
of 150 students are involved as research subjects. TAP (Toulmin
Argumentation Pattern) comprising
components of claim,
warrant, backing, and rebuttal
has been used
to analyze argumentation
discourse. The quality
of argumentation were
qualitative descriptive analyzed by complexity of argumentative
discourse. T-test was used to determine differences in the average level of the
quality of the argumentation between ADI and ADIS class. The results showed
that the quality of the students argumentation in the ADIS class better than
students in the ADI class. The ability of students in ADIS class on developing
more than one rebuttal that has the explicit
data, warrant or backing against arguments than student in ADI class. In
general, very few students are able to develop a rebuttal to the data,
warrant or backing
another students. Most
students rebuttal submitted
is not based
on a explicit rebuttal by the adequate of data,
warrant, or backing.
Penulis: Neni Hasnunidah,
Herawati Susilo, Mimien Henie Irawati, Hedi Sutomo
Kode Jurnal: jpbiologidd150517
