PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP ANGGOTA KEPOLISIAN SEBAGAI PENYEBAB MATINYA PELAKU AMUK MASSA (Study Perkara Nomor 166/Pid./2012/PN TK)
Abstrak: Crime responsibility
is matter which at the same time arise from existence of each every collision
of doing an injustice done conducted by a good somebody of ordinary people, governmental
functionary and also
aparat enforcer punish,
this of vital importance so that to be enforcer
creation punish the Regulation Lead The State police of
Republic Of Indonesia of Number 1
Year 2009 about Strength
Use of In Police Action
it is true
give the special
authority to police
in the case
of doing conducting shoot in
place for suspect. Problem of this research is : ( 1) What will be crime
responsibility to police member causing
its deatils angry
perpetrator a period
to suspect amuk
massa ( 2)
What decision Compare in High Court the Tanjungkarang have mirrored the
justice Problem approach used
by is approach
of empirical yuridis
normatif and yuridis. Research responder is Propam of at
polresta Bandar Lampung , Police of at Polresta Bandar Lampung, Attorney of at
Public Attorney of Bandar Lampung, Academician Circle of
at Univeritas Lampung.
Data collecting is
study of book
and study field. Analyse the data in this research is
analysis qualitative. Result of this solution and research show: ( 1) What will
be crime responsibility to police member causing its death is perpetrator of doing an injustice executed in
the form of crime
as decanted in
decision of District
Court of Menggala
Number 89/Pid./2012/PN MGL, that
is defendant of
Arie Gozhali of
eyebrow AG, doing proven validly and assure. the doing an injustice of moment murder run
its duty as police. Judge knock
down the crime
to defendant that
is seven year
serve a sentence, as its crime
responsibility form. but suspect raise to compare to High Court of Tanjungkarang
and broken but
suspect raise to
compare to High
Court of Tanjungkarang and
broken free by
judge ceremony with
the number of
Number decision
166/Pid./2012/PT TK (
2) What decision
Compare in High
Court the Tanjungkarang have
mirrored the justice
have been executed
by judge ceremony fixed is
crime of Arie
Gozhali of a
police Enforcer punish
the although which
is running duty oppositely also the doing an injustice. and also in its data
collecting is writer the direct interview with all police, attorney,
academician circle for the shake of assistant
and all perpetrator of doing
an injustice which
have been determined
by writer. Suggestion in this research is : ( 1) Suggested by a police
member Ought to be the can be wiser
in conducting action
shoot in place,
more professional, more
paying attention to of situation and condition in field, also pay
attention to the human side, nor
act without considering although
he is given
by the special
authority. ( 2) Suggested
by a judge
ceremony Better wiser
Tanjungkarang in determining
its decision, is more considering of
evidence from Attorney, more sensitive to sense of justice for family of
victim Anton
Penulis: Tirta Ari N. Maroni,
Renaldy Amrullah
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd141141
