TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP UPAYA PENENTUAN NASIB SENDIRI ANTARA CRIMEA DENGAN UKRAINA
ABSTRACT: In the international
law there is a principle of self-determination, which is part of Human Rights,
but the principle of the right to determine their own is still a complicated
issue. Both at the level of the conceptual and legal debate and at the level of
real politics in many regions of the world. The purpose of this research are,
first to know self-determination of the people Crimea in accordance with the
rules of International Law, second to know legality of the referendum conducted
by the Crimean residents who support the separation of the Ukraine and join
Russia, third to know How other countries recognition of the results of the
referendum citizens of Crimea. This case study further discuses about the
principles of law and comparison of law. Source of data used are secondary data
source of obtained from the literature, among others, include official
documents, books, research results in the form of reports and so on.The
conclusion of the research are, first Self-determination is a principle
embodied in international law,where such rights have been formulated in the UN
Charter. Self-determination referendum conducted by means of Crimea has a goal
to secede from Ukraine and join Russia. Second, the implementation of the
referendum should comply with provisions of Crimea in accordance with the principles
of international law. Third, recognition in international law is a fairly
complex issue because once involve legal and political issues. in the case of
Crimea recognition in the review based on the declarative theory.
Penulis: Yunita Sari
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151481
