TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NO.1/PDT.G/2016/PNBKT TENTANG PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KELAS 1B BUKITTINGGI
Abstract: The development of
community life often leads to complex problems to be solved, so it is often
resolved through the institution of the Court. One of the cases that came in
and has been decided by the District Court of New York City is a civil case
No.20/PDT.G/2015/PNBKT about tort committed by Defendant I and Defendant II did
mastery without rights, and Defendant III issued land boundaries overlap
without a clear legal basis. Issues raised in this paper are, what are the
elements Torts met in a civil case No.20/PDT.G/2015/PNBKTand what hat are the
judgment panels of judges in hearing and deciding the case
No.20/PDT.G/2015/PNBKT. This research uses normative legal research. The data
consists of primary legal materials and secondary law. Data were analyzed
qualitatively using the techniques of data collection in the form of studies
document. From the study it can be concluded that, the elements of a tort in
the civil case No.20/PDT.G/2015/PNBKT have been met.The consideration of the
judges on the case No.20/PDT.G/ 2015/PNBKT is appropriate because the judge in
the verdict is not glued to the terms in writing, but also based on the
jurisprudence used as legal basis in decisions.
Penulis: Yolanda Obelina
Ayesha Yolanda
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd170024
