Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan Nomor 45/PTS-MKD/IX/2015 Terhadap Anggota DPR RI Yang Melanggar Kode Etik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Tentang MD3
Abstract: Amendement of the
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to bring consequences to the
expectations and / or the demands of society on the performance of Members of
Parliament. To that end, each Member of Parliament should pay attention to and
promote the aspirations of constituents to the fullest. The formation of the
Court Honor Board in the House in response to the public spotlight on the
performance elements of most Members of the House are poor away from
expectations of the general public, especially local constituents. Various
community groups are critical of the parliament gives bad performance MKD
performance because it considered optimal in directing legislative work in
accordance with the code of ethics. The formulation of the issues discussed
are: 1) How is procedure conducted Court Honor Board in deciding the case No.
45 / PTS-MKD / IX / 2015 against the Member of Parliament in violation of the
Code?. 2) What is the Legal Implications of the decision of the Court of Honor
Council No. 45 / PTS / -MKD / IX / 2015 against the Member of Parliament in
violation of the Code? This type of research is a normative legal research.
Sources of data obtained from books, journals study of literature and other
sources, and data analysis used is qualitative analysis. Based on the results
of this study concluded that 1) The procedures performed Honorary Board of the
Court in deciding the case No. 45 / PTS-MKD / IX / 2015, with the occurrence of
complaints, the administrative verification, call, proof, teradu plea, verdict.
2) The legal implications of the decision of the Court of Honor Council No. 45
/ PTS-MKD / IX / 2015 is a mild sanctions in the form of a written warning.
Penulis: Nanda Wahyudi
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd170015
