STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE RECORDING PHONE TAPPING ON CORRUPTION
Abstract: Corruption is a
criminal offense remarkable. Corruption is usually done in secret. To overcome
this, a letter of Article 12 of Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Corruption
EradicationCommission, the investigator is authorized to conduct wiretaps. This
phone wiretaps used asevidence. Formulation of the problem 1) How does the
strength of evidence telephonewiretaps on corruption, 2) What is the status
telephone wiretaps on corruption. This studyuses normative juridical approach.
Materials studied law is Supreme Court Decision No ;1195/K/Pid-Sus/2014. The
legal materials obtained through the study of documents. Legalmaterials were
analyzed qualitatively. Data Sources primary legal materials, secondary law.In
conclusion 1) Strength of evidence telephone wiretaps on corruption, the
strength of evidence recording has a clear strength of evidence and legal
basis, including Section 26A of Act Number 20 of 2001 on the Amendment of Act
No. 31 of 1999 on the EradicationCorruption. 2) Position Recording Phone
Tapping On Corruption by the Supreme CourtDecision No. 1195/K/Pid-Sus/2014,
that kind of evidence set out in the Criminal Code extended by Act No. 11 of
2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions so that thewiretap recording
evidence can be accepted as valid evidence appropriate procedural lawapplicable
in Indonesia.
Penulis: Mustafa Kamal, Uning
Pratimaratri, Yetisma Saini
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151472
