Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Praperadilan Penetapan Seseorang Menjadi Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi
ABSTRACT: Pretrial a legal
action against the unauthorized inspection or not an investigation or
prosecution process, especially in the determination of a person as a suspect,
pretrial stipulated in Article 1 point 10 of the law of criminal procedure
(Criminal Code). The problems of this study are; 1) How consideration of the
judge of the pretrial petition relating to the determination of a person as a
suspect in a corruption case number 01/Pid.Pra /2016/PN.Kbr? 2) How does the
application of the law against the applicant relating to the determination of
pretrial person becomes a suspect in a corruption case number
01/Pid.Pra2016/PN.Kbr? This study used normative approach. Data used include
primary and secondary data. Data collected by the documentary study. The data
were analyzed qualitatively. The conclusions of the study; 1) Consideration of
the applicants pretrial law relating to the determination of a person as a
suspect in a corruption case number 01/Pid.Pra/2016/ PN.Kbr in the judge's
ruling states, rejected the applicant in its entirety, states warrant an
investigation by the District Attorney Branch Head Solok in Alahan Panjang
Number; print- 01/ N.3.15.7/Fd.1/03/2016 is valid binding legal effect. 2) The
verdict in the sentencing in pretrial with the case number 01/Pd.Pra
/2016/Pn.Kbr decided to reject the applicant's request in full, states warrant
an investigation by the Branch Chief State Prosecutor Solok in Alahan Panjang
No. 01/ N.3.15. 7/Fd.1/03/2016 is valid and binding legal effect.
Penulis: Riyan Mulia Safutra
Riyan Mulia
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd170054
