PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KLAS IA PADANG (Putusan No. 273/Pid.B/2011.PN.PDG)
Abstract: The death penalty
has become a punishment that can be applied to a crime that is very heavy and
the culprit can’t be developed further. Padang District Court Judge for it has
falling death penalty against the crime of murder. Issues to be discussed are:
(1) Whether the consideration of judges in bringing the death penalty verdict
against the crime of murder in the District Court of Class IA Padang? (2) How
is the application of the death penalty against the convicted person who
committed the crime of premeditated murder in the District Court of Class IA
Padang?. Normative juridical research approach. Legal materials Decision No. 273/Pid.B/2011.PN.PDG
. Data collection techniques is the study of documents and data were analyzed
qualitatively. From the results of this study concluded: (1) Consideration of
aggravating that acts defendant has violated Article 340 , 286 , 362 of the Criminal
Code , the defendant had violated the criminal law Twenty Minangkabau, the
defendant did not have compassion and mercy at all, mitigating ie not No
excuses and no mitigating circumstances penalties a defendant (2) the
application of the law in this case is murder, which is regulated in Article
340 of the Penal Code which carries a minimum sentence is the maximum death
penalty, life imprisonment or imprisonment of 20 years so that from above the
judge's decision can be seen that the judge to apply the maximum penalty for a
defendant who proved to have committed the act that is to impose the death
penalty.
Penulis: Ruslian Juliardi,
Syafridatati, Deaf Wahyuni Ramadhani
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151469
