Pelaksanaan Peradilan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Oleh Oknum Polisi Terhadap Mahasiswa (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Klas I A Padang)
Abstract: Molestation a
criminal deed undermining one of a body of a person. Not only done by ordinary
people but also done by a policeman.Problems: 1 ) to review how the judiciary
and the police, 2 ) the criminal sanctions against what the police 3 ) the
judge how does a criminal verdict against police officers.The method used
juridical sociological.Data sources a primary do an interview with someone ( 2
), the district court judge klas i.a field.The results can be concluded: the
judicial police are against violations of the code of conduct alleged violations
done will be followed by police divpropam separately up in the judges asking
witnesses and bukti- evidence.Prosecutors commonly called witness 2 ( two )
persons and the results of medical check et repertum and the judges to consider
and take the punishment.Application A crime of destroying one of the
persecution of a person. Not only ordinary people but also be done by the work
of the police.That ' s the problem: 1 ) will review the police by a court 2 )
on an application of what is the punishment of crime how can the judge
pronounced 3 ) the criminal to the police.The method used by the sociological
yuridis.Data resources and ( 2 ) should be conducted an interview with two
judges in the trial of klas i.a.The results can be concluded, the judicial process
is in the process of violations of the code of conduct is made on a separate
divpropam will be followed by police to ask for justice in the court and
witnesses bukti- evidence.Prosecutors general, called witness 2 ( two ) persons
and the results of medical check et repertum and the judge could then consider
and take the punishment. The sanctions imposed against the police are in
accordance with subsection (1), article 351 KUHP.A judge matters: 1 against the
defendant to witnesses, victims 2) a defendant for law enforcers supposed to
protect people, and what help defendants confessed to his ways, and regret
applied in the investigation and courteous, a defendant to have a clear and has
changed the treatment of the victims and witnesses the defendant not ever
punished. The sanctions imposed are in accordance with the articles of 351 kuhp
paragraph ( 1 ). Considerations: 1 ) a judge of the burden of the victims were
witnesses 2 ) the law enforcement should be working as a community, and it ' s
to help defendants admitted, and reproved her in the trial, as in manners the
defendant has to have clear and changing the treatment of the victims and
witnesses the defendant has not been punished.
Penulis: Hari Putra Ramadhan,
Fitriati, Syafridatati
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151500
