PELAKSANAAN PENGAWASAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN BERUPA REHABILITASI PECANDU NARKOTIKA OLEH HAKIM PENGAWAS (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Klas IA Padang)
Abstract: Article 277 of the
Act No. 8 of 1981 on the law of criminal procedure states that the judges have
other duties, namely to carry out the supervision and observation of the Court
ruling, implementation monitoring and observations made by the judge of
Trustees. one of the Court's verdict is overseen by a supervisory judge dropped
to narcotic addicts be undergoing treatment or rehabilitation. The problems
are: (1) how did the supervisory Court ruling against narcotic addict
rehabilitation form by supervisor at State Courst class 1A Padang? (2) whether
the obstacles found in the narcotic addict rehabilitation against oversight by
Supervisory Judges? This type of research is the sociological, juridical data
consists of primary data and secondary data. The technique of data collection
is interviews and study documents. The data were analyzed qualitatively. The
results of research: (1) the Supervisory Judge Ruling Against Narcotic Addict
Rehabilitation Form by judge Trustees: Trustees and Judges are not only
Observers in charge of the supervision of the correctional facility to the
clerk, but now the existence of Supervisory Judges and observers no longer
applies to determine whether prosecutors have been carrying out the verdict of
the Court, as appropriate. (2) supervisory Judge implementation Constraints:
there are no rules of the Supervisory judge in Correctional legislation, issues
a flurry of Supervisory, coordinating Judges less intense and not note as well
as the difficulty of a drug addict to convinced to follow the rehabilitation.
Penulis: Erich Novrianto Erich
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd160543
