IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 34/PUU-XI/2013 TENTANG PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1981 TENTANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA TERHADAP UPAYA HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI
Abstract: The Constitutional
Court of the Republic of Indonesia is one of the organizers of judicial power
in Indonesia together with the Supreme Court and courts below and the Judicial
Commission. One of the Constitutional Court's authority is to test the laws
against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as the decision
of the Constitutional Court Number 34 / PUU / XI / 2013 that the review of
Article 268 Paragraph (3) of the Law on Criminal Proceedings (Code of Criminal
Procedure ) which reads "Request for reconsideration of a decision can
only be made one time only". As a result of the decision led to a judicial
review can be done more than once. The formulation of the issues discussed are:
1) How is the legal status (legal standing) of the applicant the decision of
the Constitutional Court Number 34 / PUU / XI / 2013? 2) What are the
considerations in making a decision of the Constitutional Court to remedy
Reconsideration can be filed more than one ?. This type of research is a
normative legal research. Sources of data obtained from books, library studies
and other sources. From this study it can be concluded 1) legal status (legal
standing) The applicant in the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 34 /
PUU / XI / 2013 has no legal status (legal standing). 2) Consideration of the
Constitutional Court to make a ruling on the legal remedies Reconsideration can
be filed more than once in order to protect and uphold human rights, the
applicant PK feel tereliminir sense of justice, where the restrictions PK
should only be performed one time as stipulated in Article 268 Paragraph ( 3)
has given limits a person to seek justice because of the possible new state
(novum), can befound at any time and can not be determined exactlywhen
Penulis: Dedy Eka Putra
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd160533
