PUTUSAN VERSTEK PADA PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PAMEKASAN
Abstraction: Ideally, in
investigation of divorce case of husband and wife attend in assembly.With
attendance of the spouses, judge will be more easy to strive the peace
mentioned above. Ironically, in practice is sometimes wife or husband in
capacities as requested / sued have never attended or if to give the authority at
a advocate, the
side requested /
sued have never
attended to conference. Pursuant
to section 125 HIR to express that if sued absents to face the
assembly and do not order
others ones as
its proxy, hence
the accusation will be granted with decision the outside attending of
sued ( verstek decision). From result of research obtained by conclusion that
is; First, which cause to be
requested / to
be sued never
absents at divorce
case raised by applicant / plaintiff so that resulting the verstek decision in
Religion Justice of Pamekasan, for
example: because shame,
so that the
session will take place quickly, because sued / requested
is shy and or fear to deal with trial, and there is still some of village
headman and or modin still have a notion, society in a countryside must
inform if they will divorce.
Judge of Religion Justice of Pamekasan assess the evidence
appliances raised by applicant / plaintiff in
divorce case decided
by verstek guiding
at HIR and
also regulation of other constitutions. In the verdict of divorce case,
judge council of Religion Justice of
Pamekasan only relates
at evidence appliance
raised by plaintiff / applicant.
Penulis: Eka Susylawati, Moh.
Hasan
Kode Jurnal: jpperadabanislamdd110205
