Kritik Ibn Rusyd Terhadap Pandangan Para Filsuf Tentang Ketuhanan
Abstract: Being indirect
disciple of Aristotle, Ibn Rusyd mostly studied deeply in the area of
philosophy, but he also criticized frequently the view of other Muslim
philosophers. Ibn Rusyd’s critics in this
case are in order to purify Aristotle’s philosophy from
infiltration and distorted ideas. So then he could present the philosophy of
Aristotle genuinely. In this article, the writer wishes to present the analysis
of Ibn Rusyd on the views of Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali. Among the
philosophers except al-Ghazali, he criticized both two from their views on the
existence of God through the theory of
wajib al-wujud (necessary being) and
mumkin al-wujud(possible being). Ibnu Rusyd also rejected the theory on
emanation of al-Farabi and Ibn Sina, because not derived from Aristotle. Ibn
Rusyd concerned upon
the al-Ghazalis Tahafut
Al-Falasifah (Incoherence of the Philosophers) not represented all
philosophers views, but the views of philosophers on Neo-Platonic which
destroys the thought of Aristotle. In this point Ibn Rusyd judges,
that Al-Ghazali’s criticism is incoherence.
Penulis: Sujiat Zubaidi
Saleh
Kode Jurnal: jpperadabanislamdd090099
