Pengaturan Kewenangan, dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dalam Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Australia)
ABSTRACT: Research on:
The Rules Regarding
The Powers and
Responsibilities Of Directors In
A Limited Liability
Company (Comparative Study
of Indonesia and Australia). As
for the issues
discussed in this
study related to
the application of the
authority of the
board of directors
in the management
of a limited
liability company under the principle of fiduciary duty Australia
comparison of Indonesia can not be
separated from the
authority granted will
cause responsibility that must
be borne by the
company’s board of
directors in managing
and also the characteristics of the type of
responsibility of Directors This study
uses normative juridical approach. Juridical Approaches to run whether the
provisions of law relating to kewenagan concrete and responsibilities of the
Board of Directors
in the management
Company Limited Comparative Study of Indonesia and Australia,
while Normative is the cover of the principles of law, comparative
law, the elements
and factors related
to authority and responsibility of
the Company's Board
of Directors in
the management of one
heart-to-day. This study on Duties and Responsibilities of Directors is
normative legal research that
emphasizes the study
of literature. The
purpose of this research
is to know
the duties and
responsibilities of the
Board of Directors
of Limited Liability Company under the law. Data analysis was performed
using the comparative method of qualitative. From the results of this analysis
are expected to obtain an accurate picture and understanding of the duties and
responsibilities of the Board of Directors of Limited Liability Company. To
this effect, a
comparison of the
authority and responsibilities of the
Board of
Directors in the
management of the
Company as the
Company's assessment of body
organ is the comparison between the authority of the Board of Directors in
Indonesia and in Australia the comparative
results indicate that the system
of regulation in
Indonesia and Australia
are more inclined
to use the model and not a model enabling mandatory
because it is based by the condition of the
structure of capital
ownership. Fiduciary obligations,
particularly on legislation in
both Indonesia and Australia appear as incomplete law and need to be interpreted
by the fiduciary. The main
essence of this
comparison as the
basis for further
transplants Indonesia that fiduciary
obligations may fruitfully
dalamn Handling Company Limited.
Keywords: Authority and
Responsibility of the
Board of Directors,
Company Limited
Penulis: Shinta Ikayani
Kusumawardani
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd130251
