VALIDITAS PENAFSIRAN DALAM TAFSÎR BI AL-MA’TSÛR
Abstract: There are three
methods of interpretation used by commentators to interpret the Qur’anic
verses, by riwayah, known as tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr, by logic known as tafsîr bi
al-ra’yi and by al-isyâri. From three methods of interpretation,according to
Ibn Taymiyyah, tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr is the best method and valid. It is based
on the belief that knows the meaning of the verse is Allah, the Prophet, and
his companions. In fact, the commentary by al-ma’tsûr, not the whole verse is
interpreted by the Prophet, or friends but the majority carried out by
commentators with ijtihadnya in placing the Qur’an, Hadith and friends opinion
when interpreting a verse. Thus, differences in interpretation among
commentators bi al-ma’tsûr can not be avoided. In case of Abraham’s son who was
sacrificed, for example, between alThabari, Ibn Katsîr and Ibn ‘Athiyyah had
different opinions and attitudes of understanding of the verses. Whiletheir
interpretation is called tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr. Their different opinions
indicate that al-tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr also need a review of the validity,
especially related to commentator’s thought in placing the explanation of
Qur’an itself, Hadith and opinion in interpreting the Qur’anic verses.
Penulis: Hairul Hudaya
Kode Jurnal: jpperadabanislamdd150406
