TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA MENERIMA GRATIFIKASI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1999 JO UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
ABSTRACT: One form of
corruption most widely disclosed at this time is corruption in the form of gratification.
Gratuity is a gift, reward or gift by a person who had received services or
benefits or by persons who have or are dealing with a public or government
agencies in the example to get a contract. The purpose of this thesis to
determine criminal acts setting gratification as one of corruption in
accordance with the value of living in Indonesia and to find out about the role
of law ideal in setting gratification in Indonesia. This research is a
normative legal research because it isdone by examining the library materials
or secondary data on the crime of judicial reviewremuneration pursuant to Act
No. 31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001. Source of data used primary legal
materials, secondary and tertiary. From the results of this study concluded,
setting the crimeof graft as one of corruption in accordance with the value of
life in Indonesia, that gratification is essentially not a crime. Because
gratuities not be separated from the habits of society that have been
entrenched. If a civil servant or state officials to immediately report the
receipt of gratuities to the Corruption Eradication Commission no later than 30
(thirty) days from the date of receipt of gratuities, the criminal becomes
clear. The ideal role of law in regulating graft in Indonesia, that gratuities
are expressed as corruption since the setting in the Act Eradication of
Corruption Act Number. 20 in 2001, however, must be based on the will of the
people, the appropriate legalconsciousness of the people but it can be accepted
by the community with full awareness.
Penuli: Nadya Syafira
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151244
