TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERAMPASAN ASET-ASET TERPIDANA KORUPSI
ABSTRACK: Confiscation of
assets convicted of corruption in Indonesia, still be the pros and cons. For
those who are pro, rightfully convicted assets derived fromcorruption, it must
be cleaned and should be taken quickly before the suspect or defendant may
disguise the proceeds of crime and the exclusion of one of the statutory
objectives, namely justice. Because considering the number who engage in
corruption in Indonesia and corruption is an extraordinary crime. While they
are cons, institutions authorized to plunder not see the rights of the suspect
or the accused. The purpose of this study, to determine the expropriation of
assets settings convicted of corruption in Indonesia, to know the state may seize
suspected assets acquired prior to the occurrence of corruption, and to determine
the mechanism of execution against the assets of the accused. The purpose of
this minithesis, namely: First, to determine the implementation of
environmental criminal enforcement by the Directorate of Criminal Investigation
Special Riau Police against the perpetrators of forest and land fires. Second,
to determine the constraints faced by the Directorate ofCriminal Investigation
Special Riau Police in environmental criminal enforcement against perpetrators
of forest and land fires, and third, to find out the efforts made by the
Special Criminal Investigation Directorate Riau Police to overcome obstacles in
the enforcement of criminal law environment againstthe perpetrators of forest
and land fires. This type of research is classified in legal studies is defined
sociological look at the effectiveness of the law in force to see the
correlation between the legal community. Expropriation of assets settings
convicted of corruption provided for in Article 37 paragraph (2) and Article 38
paragraph (2) pursuant to Act No. 31 of1999 as amended into Law No. 20 of 2001
on Corruption Eradication. Can be seen, that the lack of effective and
inefficiency agencies duly authorized to that isto seize assets produced
legally. Suggestions author, the first institutions authorized to plunder
should really pay attention to the rights of thesuspect/defendant, second, Law
on Combating Crime Asset fast soon passed, soas not to create a dilemma for the
authorities to carry out their duties, and the third, assets that are evident
from the crime committed to restore the loss of thecountry's economy should be
described anywhere result of crime assets are allocated.
Penulis: Premita Yulianda
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151288
