TINJAUAN YURIDIS SENGKETA HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN TAHUN 2014 BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN
Abstract: The Constitutional
Court has such authority, to decide disputes concerning the results of the
general elections and stressed as in Article 24Cparagraph (1) of the 1945
Constitution, and further regulated in Law Number 42 of 2008 on the General
Election of President and Vice President. Application disputed election results
can be filed presented to the Constitutional Court, is only be submitted to the
determination of election results set nationally by the Election Commission,
which may affect: Determination of Candidate Pair of President and Vice President
who entered the second round of general electionsof the President and Vice
President and election of candidates for President and Vice President to become
president and vice president. The purpose of this minithesis, namely: First, to
determine the reasons for the applicant to file a dispute results of the
elections for president and vicepresident in 2014. Second, to determine whether
the results of the election dispute resolution president and vice president in
2014 in accordance with the Act No. 42 of 2008 on the General Election of
President and Vice President Of research and discussion, it can be concluded
that the First, basicallythe reasons the applicant to file a dispute over the
results of the GeneralElection of President and Vice President of the Year 2014
is not a dispute over the results of the general election of President and Vice
President. because theapplication is more tend to things that are violations of
the general elections ofPresident and Vice President. Second, Dispute Resolution
Election Results for President and Vice President 2014 by author normatively
incompatible with Law No. 42 Year 2008 regarding the General Election of
President and Vice President. However, in this case the dispute over the
results of the General Election of President and Vice President of the Year
2014 which was decided by the Constitutional Court has the right material in
accordance with the values of the constitution, and the theory of the law
states that sovereignty of the peoplewhen referring to the principles of the
implementation of direct elections , general, free, confidential, honest, and
fair.
Penulis: Yusridha Putri
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151284
