PERANAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA MONEY LAUNDERING PADA KASUS NOMOR 646/PIDANA/B/2013/PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU

ABSTRACT: Based on watchfulness result and discussion, money loundering in case Nomor 646/Pidana/B/2013/Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru, from facts revealed at conference havebeen known that any element in third accusation more subsidair fulfilled, break section 3 lawNomor 8 year 2010, paragraph 372 KUHP and paragraph 378 KUHP. In case applyelements decision Nomor 646/Pidana/B/2013/Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru, judge of districtcourt Pekanbaru appropriate apply elements in third accusation more subsidair from publicprosecutor, the elements: a. Everyoneb. Get or dominate location, transfer, payment, gift, contribution, entrusted, exchange oruse wealth treasure detect it or fitting detectt it be doing an injustice result.c. As one who does, order to do or join in to dod. Several deeds connecteds, so that thereby must be looked at as one deed sustaiined. Base judge deliberation in drop criminal in case Nomor 646/Pidana/B/2013/Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru, in drop criminal decision,considering base fallen down thecriminal, that is with base in valid proof tools, proved at conference thatcover witnesses explanation, proof goods, and explanation defendants delf.Towards valid proof tools that subbimeted in conference, and reviewed fromconformity between proof tools one by means of ohter proof, with consodering verificationvalue each proof. All juridical fact rvealed at conference appropriate and proved the true fulfil elements in third accusation more subsidair.
Keywords: Role-Prosecutor – Money Loundering
Penulis: Nova Ariati
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151489

Artikel Terkait :