PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DALAM PELANGGARAN PASAL 312 UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN RESOR KOTA PEKANBARU
ABSTRACT: Hit and run case in
traffic is a criminal offense that can lead to anxiety and raises concerns that
quite disturbing and cause harm to the victims and the people who do not know or
have been victims of hit and run that agency is not responsible. The handling
of a criminal offense must be treated seriously by the police in order to
resolve this infringement case. Therefore, the authors are interested in
conducting research under the title Against Criminal Liability Violation of
Article 312 of Law Number 22 Year 2009 regarding Traffic and Road Transportation
Law Regional Police in the city of Pekanbaru. Then to find out the barriers and
drawbacks encountered in the implementation of criminal liability for violation
of Article 312 of Law Number 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road Transportation Law
On Territory Pekanbaru City Police. The last to know the efforts to overcome
the obstacles and weaknesses of the implementation of criminal liability for
violation of Article 312 of Law Number 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road
Transportation Law On Territory Pekanbaru City Police.
In writing this essay, the author uses empirical approach or sociological
law research. Regional research sites in Pekanbaru City Police Law. Data
sources supported by theprimary data source, secondary. While data collection
techniques are interviews and reviewof data using deductive method is to
analyze the problems of a general nature then drawn to a conclusion in
particular based on existing theories. From the results of research and
discussion the authors to conclude that the First, the implementation of
criminal liability for violation of Article 312 Law on Traffic and Road Transport
are accountable for the basic errors which are intentional, but did not rule
outbecause of an omission; Second, barriers experienced in the implementation
of criminal liability for violation of Article 312 of Law Traffic and Road
Transport Police Jurisdiction In Pekanbaru City area that is a factor, the
evidence is not numbered Police, facilities and inadequate infrastructure, lack
of personnel, calling witnesses constraints, high cost in the process of
investigation and inquiry; Third, the efforts made to overcome the obstacles
and weaknesses in the implementation of criminal liability for violation of
Article 312 of Law Traffic and Road Transport Jurisdiction In Pekanbaru City
Police are making efforts to alleviate the criminal sanctions peaceful
perpetrators of hit and run, mengomptimalkan number of personnel, conduct
coordination with the SAMSAT Pekanbaru, make socialization and education to the
community, make Emergeny Call, perform intensive treatment in accident-prone
areas, to give understanding to people who are witnesses to come to address the
witness was.
Penulis: Franky Dontin Tobing
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151180
