Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Pengungkap Fakta (Whistleblower) dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi menurut Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.1390K/Pid.Sus/2011
Abstract: Proof is a process
that is critical in driving the success of uncovering a criminal case. The
proof will not be realized without the role of the witness in giving testimony.
Witness testimony is the primary evidence in Section 184 Criminal Procedure
Code. Witness Whistleblower facts is a witness that reveals a scandalous crime
that occurred in a government or private agency. The Whistleblower is Komjen
Pol. Susno Duadji then served as deputy chief of the Criminal and INTRAC. He is
that there are irregularities in the case of Gayus and Haposan Hutagalung with
indications of Corruption, which in the case of taxes and Arowana contained in
Decision No.1390K/Pid.Sus/2011 MA. The problem is: 1). How does the strength of
evidence whistleblower fact witnesses in the case of the Corruption in the case
No.1390/K/Pid.Sus/2011? 2). How does the position of expressing a fact witness
(Whistleblower) in the case of the Corruption in Case No.1390K/Pid.Sus/2011?.
While this type of research is normative, using data sources primary legal
materials, secondary and tertiary. Mechanical collection of legal materials to
study the document and the data were analyzed qualitatively. Research results
proving the fact Whistleblower witnesses in corruption cases is to have a
complete and perfect strength and Whistleblower has a very large position in
the fight against Corruption.
Penulis: Sulaiman Aryadi, Syafridatati, Deaf Ramadhani
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd141635
