ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KLAUSULA BAKU PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN KONSUMEN PT. BIMA MULTI FINANCE PEKANBARU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN
Abstrack: The law is supposed
to provide justice, because justice that the purpose of the law. Therefore
already seyogianya when the laws governing credit institutions financing
agreement also gives justice to the parties. In this connection, the contents
of the clause-clause agreement between the credit institution and the customer
Debitor financing cannot be based only upon the principle of freedom of contracts
only. How Setting the raw clause in the agreement? How does the consumer
agreement PT. Bima Multi Finance Soweto against law number 8 of 1999 challenge
shield cover Consumers? This research will examine the subject matter of the
problem in accordance with the scope and problem identification through
juridical normative approach is a research that discusses the principles of
law, systematic way of law, legal history and the synchronization level law,
and comparative law. In this study the author examines the subject of legal
arrangements regarding the synchronization level agreement against the raw
clause with consumer protection. The provisions of clause making the ban on raw
for the perpetrators of such effort in letter e of Article 18 paragraph (1),
seem to need to be revised anyway. The prohibition for businessmen to make raw
clause in the letter e should not only deal with the loss of usefulness of the
goods or the utilization of services purchased by consumers, but also reduced
the usefulness of the subject goods or services. So the full sound of the ban
that is, "set the subject of proof over the loss and reduced the
usefulness of the barangatau utilization of services purchased by consumers".
When the ban on raw clause is limited only on the subject of usability of goods
or services in a clause of standart.
Penulis: Mila Puspita Sari
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd151194
