EKSAMINASI (LEGAL ANNOTATION) SEBAGAI PINTU MASUK PROSES REFORMASI LEMBAGA PERADILAN
ABSTRACT: Judge's verdict is
independent. In practice appears the term such as "mob justice or judicial
corruption", so that the verdict is often injustice, impartial to the
public's sense, because there are still many controversial decisions and
deviate from the legal substance (material or formal), for it needs to be
studied or tested further against such decision to the public (academics, NGOs,
and practitioners), and the results need to be published. The goal is to find
or to know the judge irresponsibility in giving judgment; this is in line with
the reform era that demands for freedom, and openness (transparency). Provide
transparency to the public space for social control, which avoids the
manipulation of facts, abuse of power, and dishonesty. Examination is expected
to be the entrance of the reform process in the judiciary, as well as to assess
the extent of the professionalism and credibility of a judge in carrying out
the task or profession.
Penulis: UMMI MASKANAH
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd131077
