HADÎTS DLA’ÎF DAN KEHUJJAHANNYA (Telaah terhadap Kontroversi Penerapan Ulama’ sebagai Sumber Hukum)
Abstract: Hadits is
the second argumentation
(hujjah) source after
al-Qur’ân. However, there are many hadits refused becoming as an argumentation.
According to the perspective of a Hadîts whether it is
accepted or refused,
it has three
stages, namely shahîh, hasan, and dla’îf This article
focuses on the discussion of Hadîts dla’îf, its argumentation and also its telling.
In this relationship, there are
three arguments of
ulama’ Hadîts related
to the argument of Hadîts dla’îf .
Firtsly, the argument states that Hadîts dla’îf
cannot be applied absolutely.
Secondly, Hadîts dla’îf can be applied absolutely. Thirdly, Hadîts
dla’îf can be used in fadla’il al-amah.
In its telling,
ulama hadits reminded
people who told dla’if
Hadîts without sanad
not to tell
by redacting which showed full stability that it was a
Hadîts.
Penulis: Abdul Rokhim
Kode Jurnal: jphukumdd090111
