EFEKTIVITAS PENDAMPINGAN DESA DAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR PEDESAAN DI DESA SEKODI KECAMATAN BENGKALIS KABUPATEN BENGKALIS
Abstract: Rural infrastructure
development in the Sekodi Village of Bengkalis District that through with one
of local government programs in Bengkalis Regency than knowns as Regent
Instruction Strengthening Rural Infrastructure Program “INBUP-PPIP” which aims
to support efforts to tackle poverty and underdevelopment in rural
infrastructure in Bengkalis, so as to more increase community empowerment in
the development, the power rural assistance village known as Village
development Assistants to provide guidance, coaching, and supervision and
management of existing development activities in the village administration in
particular the implementation of INBUP-PPIP and community participation is
needed in determining the direction of and development priorities in order to
achieve a common goal.
The author takes the phenomenon of research on the effectiveness of Rural
Assistance and community participation in rural infrastructure development to
determine the public's assessment of the effectiveness of Rural Assistance, as
well as public participation in the development of rural infrastructure in the
Sekodi village, this study used a quantitative descriptive analysis and
establish a sample of 71 people Head Families (HF) were taken from every Cluster
in the village sekodi namely: Cluster in Tanjung sekodi 15% x197HF= 30 people,
15% Cluster in Nyatuh x169 HF = 25 people, cluster in Permai 15% x 109 HF = 16
people.
The results showed that, People consider that Rural Assistance still less
effective that show in terms of presence on duty in the village, facilitation
of planning, implementation, monitoring, communication, still considered less
good, although that some people have assessed the development of socialization,
planning assistance, ability, and responsibility, results in the presence of a
companion rural development in the construction of the village was considered
quite good companion, even the public judge for sustainability of care in the
village is still part of the population (respondents) who agreed to 45.1% and
the others were agreed 45.1% and 9.9% did not agree. while participation in the
development of rural infrastructure in sekodi Village still moderate that show
of participation in the meetings, mutual assistance, self-power, responsibility,
supervision, delivery cheating, keep the fruits of development,
utilization of the results, as well as overseeing the development was
considered quite active, although the submission of ideas (the proposed
development), self-funding, self-help materials assessed to be less active.
Penulis: Rezky Susanti, Basri
Kode Jurnal: jpsosiologidd150141
