EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH (NHT-PI) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALLIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI POKOK BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN
Abstract: The purposes of this
study were to determine: (1) which gives better learning achievement, NHT-PI
type, the type of TAI, or direct instruction learning model (2) which is
learning achievement better, students who have a visual, auditory or
kinesthetic learning style (3) In each type of learning model, which better
learning achievement, students who have a visual learning style, auditory or
kinesthetic (4) In each learning style, which is learning achievement better,
students who applied learning models NHT-PI, TAI, or direct instruction
learning. This study was a quasi exsperimental research. The sample of research
consisted of 280 students: 90 students in experiment 1 class, 90 students in
experiment 2 class, and 100 students in control class. The data was taken from
the result of mathematics learning achievement test and student learning style
questionnaire. The data obtained was then analyzed using a two-way ANAVA with
unbalanced cells. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following
conclusions could be drawn. (1) The learning achievement of the students
treated with NHT-PI type of learning model was better than that of those
treated with TAI type and direct learning; that of those treated with TAI was
same as that of those treated with direct learning. (2) The learning style did
not provide significant difference in learning achievement. (2) Either in NHT-PI and TAI types of cooperative
learning model or in direct learning, the different learning style did not
provide significantly different learning achievement. (4) In the students with
visual learning style, the three learning models did not provide significantly
different learning achievement; in the students with auditory learning style,
NHT-PI was as good as the TAI types, the TAI type was a good as the direct
learning, and NHT-PI was better than the direct learning; in the students with
kinesthetic learning style, the three learning model had equal effectiveness.
Keywords: Numbered Head
Together Scientific Methode Approach (NHT-PI), Team Assisted Individuallization
(TAI), Student Learning Style
Penulis: Ambar Nurhayati, Mardiyana,
Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Kode Jurnal: jpmatematikadd140161
